Your corrections now teach it

We had 700 lines of machinery for turning your edits into rules the agent follows. Nothing called it. What actually ran was: mount every file for this wedge and hope.

Now, when you edit what the agent proposed before approving it, your version is captured and turned into a rule. The next run gets the rules that matter for that client and that job — not everything ever written, which grows without limit and drowns the relevant thing.

Three decisions we would defend:

• A rule about one client beats a general rule, because the exception is the expertise.
• Auto-approvals do not count as learning. Nobody looked at them. Counting them would let a wedge that approves everything report itself getting better while getting worse.
• If the agent runs out of room for rules, it says which ones it dropped instead of silently cutting the list.

Your own words decide it, not the agent's paraphrase of them.